ALERT!
Click here to register with a few steps and explore all our cool stuff we have to offer!
Solved

User @onlyhit just scammed me for 40$ LMFAO

Submitted by Virtukyc at 13-04-2026, 11:35 PM


THREAD CLOSED

New Reply
User @onlyhit just scammed me for 40$ LMFAO
2.264 Views
Virtukyc's Avatar'
Virtukyc
Offline
#31
Still he is the reason you’re getting banned in case you’re not paying the remaining 40$ upon successfully verified.

Also, he was the one starting with the bad atitude, and you’re the one who blocked me and changed up the deal, so quit yapping lil bro
0
Virtukyc's Avatar'
Virtukyc
Offline
#32
https://imgur.com/a/N4jE91K
@beastmode

User told me to use that as explanation and now they’re requiring full on proof from that site, that is not on me.

As per the screenshots he is the reason for them not opening the account, not me.

I demand my remaining 40$ as reasoning for not opening is not on me.

If he refuses I demand him banned.
0
Virtukyc's Avatar'
Virtukyc
Offline
#33
No matter what I should be paid the remaining 40$ as they clearly confirmed the documents I used was verified and it was good to go until he chose to make me write a explanation that I’m using “ishowclips” and they’re paying out through paxum, which they’re not, they’re now requiring proof of them paying out through paxum and a screenshot of a profile which he can’t provide.
0
thecleopatra's Avatar'
thecleopatra
Offline
#34
Iam the partner of onlyhit

The user who made the scam report is amateur , he just lost us time, and scammed 40$ for me

What this guy did 

Asked me for a phone number
I gave him a phone number, which was USA , but hey he knew that
But yet he proceeded to do kyc with other country documents
And now when the paxum asked him for more verification because what the actual fuck, this guy used denmark ip, used another country documents, then added a usa phone number, he started blaming me.

I have guys in telegram dm ing me that paxum should never take more than 1-2 hours

Also he started me asking questions what to say to verify the account???? mate if i knew how to verify an account i would do it myself

I demand my $ back , the 40 usd i sent to this poor ass retard. he lost us time, and money
0
Virtukyc's Avatar'
Virtukyc
Offline
#35
I am NOT refunding for something that is none of my fault, you are the one telling me to give the explanation I gave, hence I expect you to have enough brain cells to think about the reason you give, which you did not.

I am NOT at fault for you choosing to fuck up the KYC process, I did NOT fuck it up, and the site itself confirmed my documents was verified and this was the last step.

User has failed to think and got this shit done.


I demand my 40$ or @OnlyHit banned for scamming.
0
thecleopatra's Avatar'
thecleopatra
Offline
#36
[Image: image.png]

He asking me for info , and me giving him a usa phone number

[Image: image.png]

He threating to dox us 


[Image: image.png]

Him trying to do stupid mind games

[Image: image.png]

Me teling him that we still didnt get verification
0
Virtukyc's Avatar'
Virtukyc
Offline
#37
I’ve shown all the proof you need to ban these broke ass scammers @beastmode

Up to you to decide if you’re gonna ban scammers or let them stay
0
beastmode's Avatar'
beastmode
Offline
#38
I've reviewed this entire report and the Telegram logs provided. To be honest, this is one of the most toxic disputes I've had to sit through in a while.

Virtukyc, if you're offering a KYC service, you should know better than to link Danish docs with a US phone number. That’s a rookie move and it's exactly why Paxum flagged the account for extra verification. Since the account isn't fully verified and "ready to use" as promised, you aren't getting the remaining $40.

OnlyHit / thecleopatra, you guys didn't help the situation by giving a source-of-funds explanation (ishowclips) that you couldn't actually back up with proof when Paxum asked for it. Since you both played a part in the account getting stuck, I’m not going to force a refund on the initial $40 either. Work was done, even if it was botched.

Regarding the behavior: The amount of racism and toxic trash-talking in those logs is pathetic. Both of you ignored the explicit warnings to keep it civil.

VERDICT:
- Virtukyc: Allegeance for the remaining $40 is DENIED.
- OnlyHit: Refund request for the initial $40 is DENIED.
- BOTH PARTIES are hereby issued a 1-month DWC (Deal With Caution) tag.

Case closed. Move on.
1



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)