01 — PAYMENT INFORMATION
Two separate crypto payments were made to two different wallets. $200 to SonicRefs on January 13, 2026 via 0.063 ETH. Confirmed on-chain. $22 to @onlybcfg directly on January 16, 2026 via 0.0067 ETH. Confirmed on-chain.
02 — FINDINGS
All screenshots, the full video frame by frame, the forum thread, and both payment records were reviewed.
SonicRefs gave a direct written guarantee before payment: "documents + we can reverify as many times u need + same day delivery." A specific written promise overrides any general ToS disclaimer.
The account was handed over with "We're reviewing your information" already displayed on the dashboard. @onlybcfg said this was normal. It was not.
The $20 deposit advertised as included was deposited and immediately withdrawn before delivery. The account arrived at zero balance.
The 1-month static proxy and phone number listed on the sales page were never provided.
When Wise requested new documentation, @onlybcfg submitted an AI-generated selfie containing a physical impossibility. Wise rejected it. @onlybcfg never denied it when challenged. He then stopped responding entirely.
@onlybcfg admitted in the group chat: "I use real human drops to pass verifications. I don't use uploaded documents or fullz. I don't have images of the IDs or docs." The reverification guarantee was impossible to honor from day one.
SonicRefs collected the payment, built the group, assigned the worker, and managed every step. The intermediary defense does not hold.
On the buyer's side, sending a transfer under his own name to an account under a different identity was a foreseeable risk. However the seller confirmed it would work without any warning. That duty belonged to the seller.
03 — RESOLUTION AND FINAL DECISION
Both parties have 72 hours to come forward with one of the following.
Full refund of $222 with payment proof submitted to this thread. Status will be updated to Resolved upon confirmation.
Or a functional replacement with all advertised components included and reverification capability actually demonstrated.
No response within 72 hours results in a permanent ban. @SonicRefs @dating001
Two separate crypto payments were made to two different wallets. $200 to SonicRefs on January 13, 2026 via 0.063 ETH. Confirmed on-chain. $22 to @onlybcfg directly on January 16, 2026 via 0.0067 ETH. Confirmed on-chain.
02 — FINDINGS
All screenshots, the full video frame by frame, the forum thread, and both payment records were reviewed.
SonicRefs gave a direct written guarantee before payment: "documents + we can reverify as many times u need + same day delivery." A specific written promise overrides any general ToS disclaimer.
The account was handed over with "We're reviewing your information" already displayed on the dashboard. @onlybcfg said this was normal. It was not.
The $20 deposit advertised as included was deposited and immediately withdrawn before delivery. The account arrived at zero balance.
The 1-month static proxy and phone number listed on the sales page were never provided.
When Wise requested new documentation, @onlybcfg submitted an AI-generated selfie containing a physical impossibility. Wise rejected it. @onlybcfg never denied it when challenged. He then stopped responding entirely.
@onlybcfg admitted in the group chat: "I use real human drops to pass verifications. I don't use uploaded documents or fullz. I don't have images of the IDs or docs." The reverification guarantee was impossible to honor from day one.
SonicRefs collected the payment, built the group, assigned the worker, and managed every step. The intermediary defense does not hold.
On the buyer's side, sending a transfer under his own name to an account under a different identity was a foreseeable risk. However the seller confirmed it would work without any warning. That duty belonged to the seller.
03 — RESOLUTION AND FINAL DECISION
Both parties have 72 hours to come forward with one of the following.
Full refund of $222 with payment proof submitted to this thread. Status will be updated to Resolved upon confirmation.
Or a functional replacement with all advertised components included and reverification capability actually demonstrated.
No response within 72 hours results in a permanent ban. @SonicRefs @dating001