@beastmode
This conclusion is completely out of hand. As mentioned before, the account was closed PRIOR to contacting us, a CLOSED account is not a account which requires "reverification", it is not our duty to solve CLOSED accounts.
Anything regarding claims related to "sales page" don't hold up, at the time of the deal the page was nonexistence, therefor how are we responsible for upholding a agreement that was non existant at the time of order?
"however the seller confirmed it would work without any warning". I did not confirm anything would work, I only provided the account, I simply explained what the definition of IBAN was and its basic capability. The BUYER requested Wise specifically, if he requested his own platform should it not be the buyers responsibility to know what he's asking for? As you said, it was a foreseable risk... If the buyer did not forsee anything it is due to his lack of knowledge and competance. We gave no obligation or requirement that we will tell you how to use accounts, educate you on every individual platform/actions risks, nor did we obligate that we should teach you how to operate the platform. All we simply did was provide the account as requested.
Additionally... The client VOUCHED for the service + account, he stated after everything was delivered and finalized that he was satisfied with the service, so how can he turn around now that he flagged and closed the account to blame it on us?
This was not a "reverification", this account was closed before ever being brought up to our attention, and when being brought up we stated as well not much can be done... the account was already CLOSED
This conclusion is completely out of hand. As mentioned before, the account was closed PRIOR to contacting us, a CLOSED account is not a account which requires "reverification", it is not our duty to solve CLOSED accounts.
Anything regarding claims related to "sales page" don't hold up, at the time of the deal the page was nonexistence, therefor how are we responsible for upholding a agreement that was non existant at the time of order?
"however the seller confirmed it would work without any warning". I did not confirm anything would work, I only provided the account, I simply explained what the definition of IBAN was and its basic capability. The BUYER requested Wise specifically, if he requested his own platform should it not be the buyers responsibility to know what he's asking for? As you said, it was a foreseable risk... If the buyer did not forsee anything it is due to his lack of knowledge and competance. We gave no obligation or requirement that we will tell you how to use accounts, educate you on every individual platform/actions risks, nor did we obligate that we should teach you how to operate the platform. All we simply did was provide the account as requested.
Additionally... The client VOUCHED for the service + account, he stated after everything was delivered and finalized that he was satisfied with the service, so how can he turn around now that he flagged and closed the account to blame it on us?
This was not a "reverification", this account was closed before ever being brought up to our attention, and when being brought up we stated as well not much can be done... the account was already CLOSED





STILL
⎠![[Image: uWztodn.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/uWztodn.gif)