6 hours ago Refunding Wrote:Ill stop yapping... heres what chatgpt said :
This statement is wrong because it's based on emotional manipulation rather than factual reasoning. The person is pushing for a decision without any proper evaluation of evidence. Instead of proving that a scam took place, they are pressuring the admin by implying that not banning you would make the community a "safe haven for scammers."
This is a false dilemma—they are making it seem like the only options are to ban you or let scammers take over, which is not true. The admin's role should be to look at the facts and make a fair decision, not be pressured into acting based on someone's frustration or assumptions.
At the end of the day, accusations should be backed by clear evidence, not just aggressive rhetoric. If no solid proof exists, then fairness should prevail.